![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been looking at the illustrations in 3 compendious Icelandic paper manuscripts, all of which include both the Prose and Poetic Eddas plus a lot of other material—eddic poems not in the Codex Regius but usually included in editions, some skaldic poetry such as "Sonatorrek", texts about runes ... They're quite endearing; the details suggest we're seeing entirely enlightenment thought about the gods and goddesses based on educated people reading the lore texts, and the clothing is a mix of the then modern and Renaissance ideas about sorcerors' garb, but who knows what inherited knowledge lurks. AM 738 4to, c. 1680 (Wikipedia page), is oddly tall and thin—13" x 41/12"—and so is known as the "Oblong Edda". It contains a group of 13½ illustration pages; several of these pages include 2 or 3 different people, and Hœnir is in the margin on the facing page to Bragi and Loki. The illustrations are within the Prose Edda text. NKS 1867 4º is dated 1760 (very short Wikipedia page), and SÁM 66 is dated 1765–66 (even less useful Wikipedia page, mostly pictures) and until its recent donation, was in the possession of an Icelandic-Canadian family. These are by different scribes, but each includes 16 illustrations, and although the order is a bit different, many of them are similar between the two books and only one has a different subject: NKS 1867 has Þjazi meeting his end, while SÁM 66 has the beginning of the Þjazi story, when he prevents Odin, Loki, and Hœnir from cooking their dinner. The same artist may have worked on both, or they may have a common source.
The illustrations in AM 738 4to at first glance look extremely naive in style by comparison to the later two, but I think that's because the artist was bad at human figures. And at least they've attempted three females, while the later two have nobody of the female sex except Heiðrun and Auðhumbla. The later two also have symbolic details that appear to come from either Icelandic galdr sigils, or Hermetic symbols, or Freemasonry; I don't know. ( The rest of the post is under the cut; there are 18 images. )
The illustrations in AM 738 4to at first glance look extremely naive in style by comparison to the later two, but I think that's because the artist was bad at human figures. And at least they've attempted three females, while the later two have nobody of the female sex except Heiðrun and Auðhumbla. The later two also have symbolic details that appear to come from either Icelandic galdr sigils, or Hermetic symbols, or Freemasonry; I don't know. ( The rest of the post is under the cut; there are 18 images. )